Spam filters should save time, and this one does
Why use a spam filter that you have to search through the filtered results to make sure it didn't grab something you need, like an email from your mother-in-law?
I've heard more than once people checking their spam folder for email from clients or newsletters; it's a huge waste of time and defeats the purpose of the tool, no?
MaFee SpamKiller? Silly name and also not effective.
A better solution is Cloudmark. $40/year, it catches all the bad stuff and leaves all the good stuff. I could tell you why it works well, but you're busy, so foggetaboudit. Big time saver, with a capital B. Here's what I didn't have to sift through today (partial list:)
- re system report
- You have unclaimed cash
- Re: News ok
- Wall Street is Paying Top Dollar for Old Gold and Silver Coins and Collectibles
- What IS 0EM Software And Why D0 You Care?
- Your Order
- ?
I like cloudmark a lot. However, it really slows down MS Outlook for me. I'm considering switching to gmail as it has a spam filter and it allows me to check other email on it.
Posted by: Michael Simmons (young entrepreneur journey) | May 24, 2006 at 09:03 AM